|
Post by walkerdog on Aug 18, 2023 18:59:35 GMT -5
Same old BS, you didn't answer my questions. Why waste your time engaging someone like this, Wayne? After about the 10th time of him repeating himself, it’s obvious he just wants to B&M. While it’s true that the numbers should be easily available, some of the nonsense conspiracy theories posted here as to why they aren’t already on their website are pretty hilarious. We should all be glad to not be the FWC and have to deal with all the complainers they have to. Some here have no clue about all the BS hoops a state agency has to jump through. I swear, those same people would still whine if opportunities/information/etc. were doubled, just because they’d then want them tripled. There is no point in trying to reason with people like that. They’ll just call you something ignorant like an apologist (he obviously isn’t acquainted with you🤣). Must just be in the DNA.
|
|
|
Post by joekat46 on Aug 19, 2023 6:30:23 GMT -5
Let's see how this all shakes out on the turkey harvest hidden and not reported harvest numbers (someone else can play with the deer). IMO (and others) their past wild harvest "guesses" are most likely so far from the actual numbers they have now received through their mandatory reporting system they are embarrassed to post them. Much easier to hide behind the supposed mass of non-compliant poachers. Reading my NWTF Spring 2023 Turkey Guide FWC reported their "educated" guess as 15,000 birds harvested in 2022 in the State of Florida. This total would be for both Eastern and Osceola subspecies we can assume. It isn't differentiated. Won't it be a real hoot if their new actual mandatory reporting system now only shows half that? How about if it's only 30% off? All non-compliant poachers?? Dream on. The numbers from the no check station/no drop box WMA quota hunts will be most telling. I'm still betting these numbers will be very accurate if for no other reason that the chance of being caught cheating would have been much greater and not worth the risk to these non-compliant poachers that run wild throughout the state. As is often suggested on this forum's political pages if you don't like something don't read it. Maybe the now 5000+ that have read this thread will have an impact. At least make someone think "gee these guys aren't near as dumb as we thought". I'll keep posting and the all the apologist can keep apologizing. I'll apologize when actual turkey kill totals for all of Florida's 67 counties and 139 WMAs are posted (if ever). The question will be if and when the numbers do show up if anyone will now believe them. Too bad about that. It's the hole they dug for themselves. POST THE NUMBERS.
|
|
|
Post by walkerdog on Aug 19, 2023 8:25:53 GMT -5
😂 If you can’t be right, at least be consistent. Suits you pretty well.
|
|
|
Post by joekat46 on Aug 19, 2023 9:33:51 GMT -5
What's incorrect? Have the all the turkey and deer kill numbers from the mandatory reporting systems been posted someplace that I've missed? Have I missed a secret apologist access code? This obvious intentional non reporting situation being posted on one national turkey forum before day's end. Florida post always draw great interest. 5000 views will be a drop in bucket.😱
|
|
|
Post by walkerdog on Aug 19, 2023 10:00:55 GMT -5
You’re right that it should be posted.
The rest of your conjecture is just you flailing at the bee in your bonnet. 😉
|
|
|
Post by wildman on Aug 19, 2023 10:06:09 GMT -5
While I agree the data should be posted, I don't think it is for nefarious reasons as you insist.
Mandatory reporting data tends to be low as a result of non-compliance. Phone survey estimates tend to be high given successful hunters are more likely to respond (response bias). For management purposes, the actual number isn't as important as the longer term trend of those numbers that show increasing/stable/decreasing populations.
30% non-compliance isn't uncommon in other states, with some states estimating 40+% non-compliance (at least initially).
|
|
|
Post by joekat46 on Aug 19, 2023 10:31:31 GMT -5
POST THE NUMBERS received. No more no less. Let them alibi any reason they choose for the much lower expected results they are obviously seeing. If this isn't being done nefariously it is showing a amount of incompetence and allowing way too much reliability on Resource Management to bail them out. Who gave you the 30% figure estimates ? Resource Management?
|
|
|
Post by One Man Gang on Aug 19, 2023 11:35:19 GMT -5
How can one determine a rate of non compliance with something like this? I see 30,40, and more %s thrown around arbitrarily here and other places. Where do these numbers come from? I mean, if someone isn't reporting how does one figure how many are not complying?
|
|
|
Post by joekat46 on Aug 19, 2023 11:37:49 GMT -5
How can one determine a rate of non compliance with something like this? I see 30,40, and more %s thrown around arbitrarily here and other places. Where do these numbers come from? I mean, if someone isn't reporting how does one figure how many are not complying? They don't. They guess. POST THE NUMBERS received. Nothing else matters. Wait and see if this happens - the numbers will finally be published with a footnote stating these numbers adjusted for estimated non-compliance. They will be worthless but the arrogance will be obvious. Why even bother with mandatory reporting? Just make things up and then claim 56% are happy as clams.
|
|
|
Post by wildman on Aug 19, 2023 12:42:06 GMT -5
I wasn't talking about Florida, I was referring to other states reported non-compliance rates. While there isn't any fool proof way to estimate non-compliance, other states have used LE check points, meat processor inspections, social media, etc. Heck, some states use phone and other types of surveys which we know from joekat are worthless. Several states that used to have mandatory check-stations switched to phone/internet reporting and harvest dropped significantly which was a result of increased non-compliance.
|
|
|
Post by joekat46 on Aug 19, 2023 17:17:05 GMT -5
Taking it personal? No reason to follow up with questions about actual states involved or verification of these claims. I'll let this settle for a week. Post a few Florida warnings on some national sites and if nothing has changed bump this up next weekend. We'll play again unless they've POSTED THE NUMBERS as received. Fat chance of that isn't it? Let's dig our heels in and keep the Florida hunters uninformed and just happy to be here. Really pathetic to hide behind an unknown number of supposed non-compliant poachers. POST THE NUMBERS.
|
|
|
Post by joekat46 on Aug 21, 2023 6:03:36 GMT -5
On second thought if the amount of non compliance is as high as some on this forum and other forums have suggested it is understandable they don't want the received harvest numbers openly disclosed. These numbers could make their prior guesses look foolish at best. I'll go the FOIA route and hope to get some answers prior to November when I apply for the quota hunts.
I'm punting on this issue. Know a losing hand when I see it. IMO these numbers in their entirety will never be seen on the open public web site or maybe posted with the numbers adjusted for the best guess number of non compliance especially regarding private land. At least the large number 5700+ that have read and participated in this thread should be an eye opener to some officials and remind everyone that mandatory reporting in now required. Physical tags for all are urgently needed IMO.
|
|
|
Post by bullfrog on Aug 21, 2023 16:04:07 GMT -5
On second thought if the amount of non compliance is as high as some on this forum and other forums have suggested it is understandable they don't want the received harvest numbers openly disclosed. These numbers could make their prior guesses look foolish at best. I'll go the FOIA route and hope to get some answers prior to November when I apply for the quota hunts. I'm punting on this issue. Know a losing hand when I see it. IMO these numbers in their entirety will never be seen on the open public web site or maybe posted with the numbers adjusted for the best guess number of non compliance especially regarding private land. At least the large number 5700+ that have read and participated in this thread should be an eye opener to some officials and remind everyone that mandatory reporting in now required. Physical tags for all are urgently needed IMO. Yes, it will call into question the previous data on which current policies have been set, and lower hunter moral for bag limits when they realize they’re the only ones following the rules and their neighbors are not. I believe those two prongs are the almost entirety of the answer as to why the numbers aren’t posted.
|
|
|
Post by joekat46 on Aug 23, 2023 5:55:13 GMT -5
Some deer numbers now listed in the Deer and Turkey Hunting section. Not county by county totals or for turkey but they are a start. Thank you.
|
|
|
Post by walkerdog on Aug 25, 2023 18:34:51 GMT -5
You should understand that the number of views isn’t the same as the number of unique viewers. Having a whopping 100 viewers that opened the thread 57 times each would get you your 5700 views. Just saying.
If you want to see something get done (and not just with this issue) spend less time biatching and more time talking to the people who are actually in a position to make it happen. Incessantly posting complaints never gets anyone anywhere.
Hopefully, a new reporting system vendor is in the future.
|
|
|
Post by joekat46 on Aug 26, 2023 8:31:16 GMT -5
Now I get it. Ten guys read these post 700 times each. There was really little interest in harvest numbers. Lol.
|
|
|
Post by bullfrog on Aug 26, 2023 9:02:19 GMT -5
Some deer numbers now listed in the Deer and Turkey Hunting section. Not county by county totals or for turkey but they are a start. Thank you. Can you link to where? What I'm seeing is still "estimated" numbers, which tells me it's probably being calculated with more than just the actual harvest reports.
|
|
|
Post by wayvis on Aug 26, 2023 13:00:33 GMT -5
I think Joecat is referring to the WMA harvest numbers in the Deer and Turkey section of this forum.
|
|
|
Post by joekat46 on Aug 26, 2023 19:09:55 GMT -5
The two threads could have been combined. The actual individual numbers for WMA 🦌 are there thanks to wayvis.
|
|
|
Post by meateater on Aug 30, 2023 10:33:33 GMT -5
top 5 spring turkey south wmas. 1 fisheating creek 2 ok slough 3 dinner island 4 big cypress/panther area 5 big cypress/ crew area. honorable mention allapatta flats. best non quota jw corbett. most improved,,, tie , spirit of the wild and picayune strand
|
|
|
Post by One Man Gang on Aug 30, 2023 11:13:29 GMT -5
top 5 spring turkey south wmas. 1 fisheating creek 2 ok slough 3 dinner island 4 big cypress/panther area 5 big cypress/ crew area. honorable mention allapatta flats. best non quota jw corbett. most improved,,, tie , spirit of the wild and picayune strand Thanks for that! I've been trying to hunt the wrong places apparently!
|
|
|
Post by joekat46 on Aug 30, 2023 14:15:58 GMT -5
And none should be a big surprise. One has always been hot but a very limited quota. Had 7 points and still didn't draw one of these. Think the system is rigged. Lol. Did they finally post 🦃 results for all WMAS? I had stopped looking.
|
|
|
Post by joekat46 on Sept 16, 2023 5:47:39 GMT -5
Mentioned this multiple times on other similar threads. I did recently send in a FOIA request for all the turkey harvest reports from all the WMAs that allowed turkey hunting. I hope to receive a report such as what has been posted here by wayvis for deer kills. Mandatory turkey reporting has been required since fall of 2022 so they do have these totals. It no longer matters if the area has check stations or drop boxes. They have the numbers reported from the telephone and computer reports. Let's see them. No more stonewalling.
A hunter on the Old Gobbler forum mentioned he made a FOIA request for the 🦌 and 🦃 reporting numbers to FWC several weeks ago. He received the deer report but as yet not the turkey. Stonewalling. The numbers reported must be dismal. Actual physical tags are needed for multiple reasons.
|
|