|
Post by biminitwisted on Oct 22, 2024 12:05:55 GMT -5
More from the intellectually honest right. I wonder why they won't post about the rest of the shitty poll they cite? Who does it claim is winning. (reality decoder ring may be needed for some of out member who suffer from perpetual cognitive dissonance. The margins of error for the small subsamples of Latinos and Black voters are plus or 9 points − a potential shift of up to 18 points one way or the other − and other recent polls show Harris in a stronger position, including a lead among Hispanics.
|
|
|
Post by resinhead on Oct 22, 2024 14:19:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by luapnor on Oct 22, 2024 15:15:08 GMT -5
"Get back on that plantation..."
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Oct 22, 2024 15:16:17 GMT -5
BREAKING: The Georgia Supreme Court has unanimously denied the an effort to quickly reinstate controversial rule changes approved State Election Board.
|
|
|
Post by resinhead on Oct 22, 2024 18:26:45 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by resinhead on Oct 22, 2024 18:29:08 GMT -5
Release the tape!!!
|
|
|
Post by throttle on Oct 22, 2024 18:56:10 GMT -5
Did he forget that the shameless democrats have already tried that? Senility is the gift that keeps on giving...
|
|
|
Post by resinhead on Oct 22, 2024 19:06:40 GMT -5
These photos will never go away thanks to the democrat party. NEVER!
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Oct 22, 2024 19:54:34 GMT -5
^ There's nothing legally stopping him.
|
|
|
Post by JS84 on Oct 23, 2024 6:53:07 GMT -5
The fifth and fourteenth amendments come to mind
|
|
|
Post by cadman on Oct 23, 2024 8:27:13 GMT -5
The fifth and fourteenth amendments come to mind Supreme court ruled a President could violate these amendments in the course of his duty unless Congress decides to impeach him. BT is leaving that part out. If Biden did do something crazy, which he isn't, congress would simply impeach him, find him guilty, and then his immunity goes away, as i understand the decision. Same thing would be true for Trump. If he went off the deep end with using the military to go after political opponents and such, Congress would impeach him and Vance would be President. But BT does throw a fine spread when he's trolling and gets a lot of good hits.
|
|
|
Post by JS84 on Oct 23, 2024 8:31:52 GMT -5
I believe the immunity is for the single person; the president. So Biden himself couldn't be held accountable by a court of law for breaking a law during the course of his administration. However the 5th and 14th speak of GOVERNEMENT directly, not the president. Additionally, are the constitutional amendments regarded as laws? Freedom of speech I don't believe is a law, it's a right afforded by the US constitution. All of this to say it wouldn't fly as it's been presented by BT. We all know that
|
|
|
Post by luapnor on Oct 23, 2024 8:51:21 GMT -5
I believe the immunity is for the single person; the president. So Biden himself couldn't be held accountable by a court of law for breaking a law during the course of his administration. However the 5th and 14th speak of GOVERNEMENT directly, not the president. Additionally, are the constitutional amendments regarded as laws? Freedom of speech I don't believe is a law, it's a right afforded by the US constitution. All of this to say it wouldn't fly as it's been presented by BT. We all know that The Bill of Rights did not grant rights, it enumerated several of the important ones. It also said that there are other rights not listed. I dont think a constitutional amendment could legitimately remove any of them.
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Oct 23, 2024 9:31:35 GMT -5
If not impeached is key of course. Does one think that the current Senate would convict?
Biden can do most anything he likes. Or Kamala can if he were to resign.
Actions could be top secret, and legal, and Congress may never even know about it.
By the time it's litigated, especially after Biden's is out of office, the country would be saved by his official duties.
They can cry to the court after that, but it won't make a diffrence.
|
|
|
Post by cadman on Oct 23, 2024 11:03:49 GMT -5
I believe the immunity is for the single person; the president. So Biden himself couldn't be held accountable by a court of law for breaking a law during the course of his administration. However the 5th and 14th speak of GOVERNEMENT directly, not the president. Additionally, are the constitutional amendments regarded as laws? Freedom of speech I don't believe is a law, it's a right afforded by the US constitution. All of this to say it wouldn't fly as it's been presented by BT. We all know that As I understand the SCOTUS ruling, the office of the President and the person holding have broad immunity from judicial prosecution or oversight for actions taken as part of their official duties. There is no distinction regarding if those actions are violations of the law or violations of the Constitution. The only way a President can be held responsible would be for Congress to impeach him and remove the immunity. Therefore the President, in theory, could order an opponent executed as a threat to national security and unless congress took action to stop him, it would be fine use of his powers. He could also, as part of his authority, jail such an opponent under the same threat to national security and, unless congress stopped him, it would be a fine use of his powers. The jailed opponent would still have his right to a trial, bail, and such, but he would have still been in jail as a threat to national security. His opponent could do nothing to stop this legally in the courts or go after the President for doing such acts, UNLESS Congress steps in and impeaches him to stop the actions. The courts hands would be tied due to the immunity SCOTUS granted until congress took action. Before that ruling, the opponent could have gotten a judge to rule the President's actions were unconstitutional and went after the President criminally and civilly for such actions. BT's point is SCOTUS said the President has broad powers and is immune from court actions to stop him unless Congress acts first to remove such immunity. it is a broad interpretation of the decision and some day SCOTUS may have to revisit and narrow the limits of such immunity. In theory, a President COULD do some crazy stuff, but we all know either Congress would stop him with an impeachment or the VP and cabinet would invoke the 25th, remove him, and stop him.
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Oct 23, 2024 11:25:05 GMT -5
I believe the immunity is for the single person; the president. So Biden himself couldn't be held accountable by a court of law for breaking a law during the course of his administration. However the 5th and 14th speak of GOVERNEMENT directly, not the president. Additionally, are the constitutional amendments regarded as laws? Freedom of speech I don't believe is a law, it's a right afforded by the US constitution. All of this to say it wouldn't fly as it's been presented by BT. We all know that As I understand the SCOTUS ruling, the office of the President and the person holding have broad immunity from judicial prosecution or oversight for actions taken as part of their official duties. There is no distinction regarding if those actions are violations of the law or violations of the Constitution. The only way a President can be held responsible would be for Congress to impeach him and remove the immunity. Therefore the President, in theory, could order an opponent executed as a threat to national security and unless congress took action to stop him, it would be fine use of his powers. He could also, as part of his authority, jail such an opponent under the same threat to national security and, unless congress stopped him, it would be a fine use of his powers. The jailed opponent would still have his right to a trial, bail, and such, but he would have still been in jail as a threat to national security. His opponent could do nothing to stop this legally in the courts or go after the President for doing such acts, UNLESS Congress steps in and impeaches him to stop the actions. The courts hands would be tied due to the immunity SCOTUS granted until congress took action. Before that ruling, the opponent could have gotten a judge to rule the President's actions were unconstitutional and went after the President criminally and civilly for such actions. BT's point is SCOTUS said the President has broad powers and is immune from court actions to stop him unless Congress acts first to remove such immunity. it is a broad interpretation of the decision and some day SCOTUS may have to revisit and narrow the limits of such immunity. In theory, a President COULD do some crazy stuff, but we all know either Congress would stop him with an impeachment or the VP and cabinet would invoke the 25th, remove him, and stop him. What if that stuff involves national security and other top secret, eyes only, issues that Congress would never even be aware of until long after Biden is out of office? Think about all the stuff Trump did that no one knew about for years. Biden will be in a home by the time it's discovered.
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Oct 23, 2024 11:34:43 GMT -5
I think it's hilarious that all those that think Biden is such a criminal, refuse to believe he's doing some really shady shit right now with all his newfound power.
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Oct 23, 2024 11:40:22 GMT -5
In extreme cases, particularly in intelligence or covert operations, the president can delay informing Congress for months.
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Oct 23, 2024 11:44:48 GMT -5
Maybe that's why Elon seems to be so worried.
There is literally nothing to protect him, especially since he's a defense contractor with security clearance which he had to apply for, and abide by all the agreed terms, or else.
It's an NSA matter.
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Oct 23, 2024 11:57:19 GMT -5
Think about what he's doing that only a few know about. Biden Admin. Thwarting Conservative Media Probe of His ‘Voter Access’ Executive OrderPresident Biden’s administration is going to great lengths to keep the media, the public, and even congressional committees from finding out whether his so-called “voter access” executive order is being used to illegally recruit Democrat voters for November’s elections.
In this, the third in a three-part series of articles on the cover-up, CNSNews examines how the administration is working to keep conservative media in the dark about potentially partisan activities and misuse of federal funds allocated in Biden’s 2021 Executive Order 14019. The order requires all federal agencies to use government resources and federal funds, which critics have branded “Bidenbucks,” to promote “access to voting” by registering voters.
One tactic being used by the Biden Administration is to comply with Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests by the media, but redact the content of the documents it turns over to the point of rendering them meaningless. In one case, a government communication obtained by The Daily Signal was entirely blacked out, with the exception of the words “We look forward to working with you to.”
In another ploy to avoid transparency regarding the executive order’s execution, the administration has gone so far as to invoke presidential communications privilege, deliberative process privilege – and even attorney-client privilege.
Most often, however, the White House and federal agencies have simply ignored requests for comment, clarification or information when they’ve come from media like Fox News, The Washington Examiner, The Federalist or The Daily Signal.
Even when media investigations have turned up evidence that the Biden Administration is using the executive order to collude with far-left activist groups and focus registration efforts on predominately Democrat voter groups – such as Latinos, felons, and Welfare recipients – the administration has chosen to duck requests for comment.[/b] mrctv.org/blog/craig-bannister/biden-admin-thwarting-conservative-media-probe-his-voter-access-executive?twclid=24ap5b95at7sgfpmki09ye960t
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Oct 23, 2024 12:21:40 GMT -5
I'm sure MAGA has nothing to worry about.
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Oct 23, 2024 13:23:39 GMT -5
“Yes” — President Biden believes Donald Trump is a fascist, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre tells reporters.
|
|
|
Post by resinhead on Oct 23, 2024 13:24:35 GMT -5
Folks, a new record, seven posts in a row!
|
|
|
Post by JS84 on Oct 23, 2024 13:27:11 GMT -5
You broke up the streak
|
|
|
Post by luapnor on Oct 23, 2024 13:57:22 GMT -5
He should really lay off the meth...
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Oct 23, 2024 15:35:19 GMT -5
Send in the MAGA Gravy SEALS. (Official Duty™)
|
|
|
Post by walkerdog on Oct 23, 2024 19:51:05 GMT -5
If not impeached is key of course. Does one think that the current Senate would convict? Biden can do most anything he likes. Or Kamala can if he were to resign. Actions could be top secret, and legal, and Congress may never even know about it. By the time it's litigated, especially after Biden's is out of office, the country would be saved by his official duties. They can cry to the court after that, but it won't make a diffrence. So the people all live happily ever after in your fairy tale! How nice!😂
|
|
|
Post by JS84 on Oct 24, 2024 6:04:06 GMT -5
Shhhhhhh. They are saving democracy.
|
|
|
Post by resinhead on Oct 24, 2024 6:42:33 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by resinhead on Oct 24, 2024 7:12:09 GMT -5
She is stupid.
|
|