|
Post by Tarponator on Oct 17, 2024 16:42:03 GMT -5
Cry more? You have some twisted mind if you think it's ok for the media to twist events to suit them or any candidate. Per the FCC, "Broadcasters may not intentionally distort the news. The FCC states that "rigging or slanting the news is a most heinous act against the public interest."" www.fcc.gov/sites/default/files/complaints_about_broadcast_journalism.pdfCBS accused of 'significant and intentional news distortion' in FCC complaint over '60 Minutes' editwww.aol.com/news/cbs-accused-significant-intentional-news-195151578.html"CBS News has been accused of "significant and intentional news distortion" in a formal complaint the Center for American Rights filed with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) on Wednesday. CBS News has taken heat in recent days for airing two different answers to the same question in its "60 Minutes" interview last week with Vice President Kamala Harris. Harris was mocked by conservatives when footage of her offering a lengthy "word salad" was aired by CBS' "Face the Nation" to promote the "60 Minutes" sit-down, when Bill Whitaker asked why it seemed like Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu wasn’t listening to the U.S. However, the vice president’s lengthy answer didn’t make the version that aired on Monday night on "60 Minutes" and a shorter, more focused answer to the same question was shown instead. The Center for American Rights, also known as CAR, argued that the discrepancies "amount to deliberate news distortion — a violation of FCC rules governing broadcasters' public interest obligations."" You must have "some twisted mind" if you take the accusations of "The Center for American Rights" at face value.
Know anything about that group?
|
|
|
Post by tonyroma on Oct 17, 2024 16:50:41 GMT -5
Based on the lines at the polls today, I dont think North Carolina is going to be in question for Trump. How many lines did you stand in?
|
|
|
Post by JS84 on Oct 17, 2024 16:55:00 GMT -5
it's 100% foreign crypto bros that can't vote in America and know nothing about us, really. Period. Thank you for your insightful analysis of the platform. This is the opinion I spoke of.
|
|
|
Post by JS84 on Oct 17, 2024 16:58:00 GMT -5
You must have "some twisted mind" if you take the accusations of "The Center for American Rights" at face value.
Know anything about that group?
No one is stumping for CAR and you're deflecting from the facts here. I don't care who filed the complaint nor who the accused is. It's plain wrong, any way you slice it
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Oct 17, 2024 17:03:23 GMT -5
it's 100% foreign crypto bros that can't vote in America and know nothing about us, really. Period. Thank you for your insightful analysis of the platform. This is the opinion I spoke of. If you feel that foreigner's opinions of the American election outcome carries that much weight, more power to you. Considering how they blew it in the midterms, and other times, I don't see where one could honestly make the case that it is a credible predictor.
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Oct 17, 2024 17:06:35 GMT -5
Crypto Anonymity: Polymarket's use of cryptocurrency adds a layer of anonymity to its users. This makes it difficult to trace whether any foreign government, including Russia, is using the platform to influence outcomes or manipulate market sentiment indirectly.
|
|
|
Post by cadman on Oct 17, 2024 17:12:41 GMT -5
You must have "some twisted mind" if you take the accusations of "The Center for American Rights" at face value.
Know anything about that group?
No one is stumping for CAR and you're deflecting from the facts here. I don't care who filed the complaint nor who the accused is. It's plain wrong, any way you slice it 60 minutes is Tucker Carlson, The View, Ingram Angle, The Five, or any other interview show. They can tilt interviews however they wish. They do not portray it is factual news reporting. It is entertainment. The FCC is not going to attempt to step on CBS's first amendment rights any more then they would any other network. All of the shows mentioned have distorted interviews and stories to favor their position.
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Oct 17, 2024 17:19:43 GMT -5
No one is stumping for CAR and you're deflecting from the facts here. I don't care who filed the complaint nor who the accused is. It's plain wrong, any way you slice it 60 minutes is Tucker Carlson, The View, Ingram Angle, The Five, or any other interview show. They can tilt interviews however they wish. They do not portray it is factual news reporting. It is entertainment. The FCC is not going to attempt to step on CBS's first amendment rights any more then they would any other network. All of the shows mentioned have distorted interviews and stories to favor their position. Wait, we've been told that conservative media doesn't do that sort of thing. What are, some sort of Communist?
|
|
|
Post by Tarponator on Oct 17, 2024 17:27:44 GMT -5
You must have "some twisted mind" if you take the accusations of "The Center for American Rights" at face value.
Know anything about that group?
No one is stumping for CAR and you're deflecting from the facts here. I don't care who filed the complaint nor who the accused is. It's plain wrong, any way you slice it I never said anyone was stumping for CAR -- and I presume you educated yourself about them as you ignored my question -- but you sure did repeat their accusations and even seemingly presented them them as fact.
To wit: What facts are you referring to? What if the accusation is wrong?
I can understand why you might ignore those questions, too, but for those unaware, CAR is a group of right-wing lawyers.
Surprise, surprise.
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Oct 17, 2024 17:46:00 GMT -5
Looks like the stable genius is upset that cultists may see the truth. Can't have that.
|
|
|
Post by luapnor on Oct 17, 2024 17:56:09 GMT -5
Based on the lines at the polls today, I dont think North Carolina is going to be in question for Trump. How many lines did you stand in? Line of cars to park and line of people to check in and line to get to a voting booth.
|
|
|
Post by JS84 on Oct 17, 2024 18:06:05 GMT -5
No one is stumping for CAR and you're deflecting from the facts here. I don't care who filed the complaint nor who the accused is. It's plain wrong, any way you slice it I never said anyone was stumping for CAR -- and I presume you educated yourself about them as you ignored my question -- but you sure did repeat their accusations and even seemingly presented them them as fact.
To wit: What facts are you referring to? What if the accusation is wrong?
I can understand why you might ignore those questions, too, but for those unaware, CAR is a group of right-wing lawyers.
Surprise, surprise.
There is clear video evidence. I believe what I've seen
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Oct 17, 2024 18:10:47 GMT -5
I never said anyone was stumping for CAR -- and I presume you educated yourself about them as you ignored my question -- but you sure did repeat their accusations and even seemingly presented them them as fact.
To wit: What facts are you referring to? What if the accusation is wrong?
I can understand why you might ignore those questions, too, but for those unaware, CAR is a group of right-wing lawyers.
Surprise, surprise.
There is clear video evidence. I believe what I've seen Yet crickets when Fox News Channel edited Trump's statements to exclude the enemy within parts when asking Harris to comment on what Trump said. Is that not on video too, but I guess you missed that.
|
|
|
Post by JS84 on Oct 17, 2024 18:54:38 GMT -5
You're comparing apples to acorns.
Lacking to word for word repeat an entire quote is not editing. I'm not aware of what you're referring to specifically but I'm addressing your exact statement.
However, literally cutting out segments of the answer and reconstructing the recorded video response is in fact editing.
You and Tarpon are arguing for media deception; you and your kind are the enemy within plain and simple.
|
|
|
Post by whitebacon on Oct 17, 2024 19:00:58 GMT -5
Is that a yes? Or no? Tell you what, I will say, go ahead and welch on the bet. Just admit you were wrong. Do you not understand how betting works? He has to accept the bet, which he did not. Just because you propose it does not make it a bet. I'm not that stupid. He can donate the money.
|
|
|
Post by JS84 on Oct 17, 2024 19:27:45 GMT -5
Yet crickets when Fox News Channel edited Trump's statements to exclude the enemy within parts when asking Harris to comment on what Trump said. Is that not on video too, but I guess you missed that. Any US media outlet directly deceiving America citizen should be held accountable regardless of the outlet. If you believe Fox News perpetrated these same acts, I urge you to report them. I'll provide all of the details below. Filing a complaint You have multiple options for filing a complaint with the FCC: • File a complaint online at consumercomplaints.fcc.gov• By phone: 1-888-CALL-FCC (1-888-225-5322); TTY: 1-888-TELL-FCC (1-888-835-5322); ASL: 1844-432-2275 • By mail (please include your name, address, contact information and as much detail about your complaint as possible): Federal Communications Commission Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Consumer Inquiries and Complaints Division 45 L Street NE Washington, DC 20554
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Oct 17, 2024 19:58:09 GMT -5
Yet crickets when Fox News Channel edited Trump's statements to exclude the enemy within parts when asking Harris to comment on what Trump said. Is that not on video too, but I guess you missed that. Any US media outlet directly deceiving America citizen should be held accountable regardless of the outlet. If you believe Fox News perpetrated these same acts, I urge you to report them. I'll provide all of the details below. Filing a complaint You have multiple options for filing a complaint with the FCC: • File a complaint online at consumercomplaints.fcc.gov• By phone: 1-888-CALL-FCC (1-888-225-5322); TTY: 1-888-TELL-FCC (1-888-835-5322); ASL: 1844-432-2275 • By mail (please include your name, address, contact information and as much detail about your complaint as possible): Federal Communications Commission Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Consumer Inquiries and Complaints Division 45 L Street NE Washington, DC 20554 No thanks, I’m old and worldly enough to know the way the world works.
|
|
|
Post by JS84 on Oct 17, 2024 20:04:14 GMT -5
Yet you are the crickets you speak of
|
|
|
Post by cadman on Oct 17, 2024 20:21:22 GMT -5
You're comparing apples to acorns. Lacking to word for word repeat an entire quote is not editing. I'm not aware of what you're referring to specifically but I'm addressing your exact statement. However, literally cutting out segments of the answer and reconstructing the recorded video response is in fact editing. You and Tarpon are arguing for media deception; you and your kind are the enemy within plain and simple. Fox literally edited out segments of the Trump all women town hall. Anything that had to do with the women being Republican staff, campaign workers, voted for Trump, chanting Trump's name. All to pretend it was a random audience. And no I ain't complaining because it isn't any more illegal than what 60 Minutes did. The complaint is a conservative group trying to make it a hig deal just before the election. Just like MSNBC breaking the story about Trump trying to pay Stormy Daniels AGAIN to get her to shut up Both are just political BS
|
|
|
Post by whitebacon on Oct 17, 2024 21:03:44 GMT -5
Do you not understand how betting works? He has to accept the bet, which he did not. Just because you propose it does not make it a bet. I'm not that stupid. He can donate the money. He owes the money. Anyone so stupid, and so hellbent on being stupid, should pay. Give me a break.
|
|
|
Post by Tarponator on Oct 17, 2024 21:21:23 GMT -5
I never said anyone was stumping for CAR -- and I presume you educated yourself about them as you ignored my question -- but you sure did repeat their accusations and even seemingly presented them them as fact.
To wit: What facts are you referring to? What if the accusation is wrong?
I can understand why you might ignore those questions, too, but for those unaware, CAR is a group of right-wing lawyers.
Surprise, surprise.
There is clear video evidence. I believe what I've seen I've seen it too.
What do you think you saw?
|
|
|
Post by Tarponator on Oct 17, 2024 21:23:01 GMT -5
You're comparing apples to acorns. Lacking to word for word repeat an entire quote is not editing. I'm not aware of what you're referring to specifically but I'm addressing your exact statement. However, literally cutting out segments of the answer and reconstructing the recorded video response is in fact editing. You and Tarpon are arguing for media deception; you and your kind are the enemy within plain and simple. Fox literally edited out segments of the Trump all women town hall. Anything that had to do with the women being Republican staff, campaign workers, voted for Trump, chanting Trump's name. All to pretend it was a random audience. And no I ain't complaining because it isn't any more illegal than what 60 Minutes did. The complaint is a conservative group trying to make it a hig deal just before the election. Just like MSNBC breaking the story about Trump trying to pay Stormy Daniels AGAIN to get her to shut up Both are just political BS Now, you, SHHHHHH!!!
I go and eat dinner, and you (and BT) took all the fun!
|
|
|
Post by johnnybandit on Oct 17, 2024 21:34:53 GMT -5
Thank you to whoever on her staff that convinced her to do this. IF you think that interview was good for trump... you are sadly mistaken.... I have always respected brett baier as a true journalist.... in this interview he proved himself just another weak trump shill. And Kamala bent him over the table and shoved her fist up his ass... And he liked it...
|
|
|
Post by johnnybandit on Oct 17, 2024 21:37:43 GMT -5
After the Fox interview.... democrat voters are asking the DNC to put Biden back on the ballot. LMAO....
the Maga is dying.... And the maga people are terrified... .
|
|
|
Post by tonyroma on Oct 17, 2024 21:53:43 GMT -5
How many lines did you stand in? Line of cars to park and line of people to check in and line to get to a voting booth. How long were the lines in Charlotte ,Raleigh , and Fayetteville?
|
|
|
Post by johnnybandit on Oct 17, 2024 22:04:38 GMT -5
in 2016 All of the polls showed Hillary winning Handily.... and I bet Rory Mar a bunch of y'all know him... 500 that trump would win.... And I got him to give me 4 to 1 odds... At the time... both he and I were both backing trump.... He lost... and I had a check in my mailbox Saturday morning....
Kamala is winning this one..... I have not made a wrong pick....Since Ford Carter in 1976.... It is all on what I learned from my father...His first college degree is in political science.... His first pick was Eisenhower vs Stevenson in 1952.... He has never been wrong...saHe drills down... He does not close attention to polls.... He ain't been wrong yet.... he says this one is going to be close... The closest of his life.... But he says Kamala is winning..
|
|
|
Post by whitebacon on Oct 17, 2024 23:04:49 GMT -5
Do you not understand how betting works? He has to accept the bet, which he did not. Just because you propose it does not make it a bet. I'm not that stupid. He can donate the money. Leave it to Cad to come to the defense of the liberal loser. Shocking. Just shocking, I tell ya!!!
|
|
|
Post by JS84 on Oct 18, 2024 8:18:54 GMT -5
Fox literally edited out segments of the Trump all women town hall. Anything that had to do with the women being Republican staff, campaign workers, voted for Trump, chanting Trump's name. All to pretend it was a random audience. And no I ain't complaining because it isn't any more illegal than what 60 Minutes did. The complaint is a conservative group trying to make it a hig deal just before the election. Just like MSNBC breaking the story about Trump trying to pay Stormy Daniels AGAIN to get her to shut up Both are just political BS You're still comparing apples to acorns. Editing segments of an entire recorded event to create a finished product that fits within a specific allotted chunk of programming is not the same as cutting up the answer to a single question and reconstructing it to say something different. Pretty straight forward here but you all keep side stepping and trying to compare two different situations Furthermore, I've already stated that any outlet committing the same acts should be held accountable. So tell me what you are arguing in support of Tarpon, Bim, and Cad?
|
|
|
Post by meateater on Oct 18, 2024 10:57:40 GMT -5
No one is stumping for CAR and you're deflecting from the facts here. I don't care who filed the complaint nor who the accused is. It's plain wrong, any way you slice it 60 minutes is Tucker Carlson, The View, Ingram Angle, The Five, or any other interview show. They can tilt interviews however they wish. They do not portray it is factual news reporting. It is entertainment. The FCC is not going to attempt to step on CBS's first amendment rights any more then they would any other network. All of the shows mentioned have distorted interviews and stories to favor their position. it was election interference and you should be ashamed of yourself trying to justify it it in anyway. independents are not sheep or followers and you are no independent thats for sure.
|
|
|
Post by luapnor on Oct 18, 2024 12:39:24 GMT -5
Line of cars to park and line of people to check in and line to get to a voting booth. How long were the lines in Charlotte ,Raleigh , and Fayetteville? I dont know.
|
|