|
Post by cadman on May 19, 2024 13:50:54 GMT -5
He should not have listed it all all. He should have paid it from personal funds and not tried to hide it under a business expense. It was a personal expense to keep the story quiet. If he had done that, it would not be an issue. Why pretend it was legal business expenses is beyond me. I get having Cohen pay her and he pays Cohen, but do it with one of your personal accounts. Right there you won the case for Trump. If the payment is for personal reasons NOT to interfere with an election than he is innocent. You keep conflating two different cases. If he bought the story like you said, then he innocent as it is a legitimate expense. Only way it is a crime is if he did it to interfere with 2016 election. What did Hillary list her checks to Perkins Coie listed as? HE LISTED IT AS A BUSINESS EXPENSE FOR LEGAL SERVICES. I SAID IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN PERSONAL, TRUMP WAS THE DUMBASS WHO DECIDED TO PAY IT OUT OF COMPANY FUNDS TO INFLUENCE THE ELECTION.
|
|
|
Post by cadman on May 19, 2024 13:59:29 GMT -5
Both companies were owned by Trump. Take it up with the IRS, they are the ones saying it is not legit and they want $100 million in taxes. I just relayed the story. As I said, it will likely end up in court if Trump doesn't settle. That doesn't matter. Both companies are different entities. Some of the developers i work with start a new LLC for every project. That way when the project is over the LLCs are closed and all liability ends there. That's what the different companies are for. The ultimate owner does not matter. If it was not trump, it would be a non-issue. The IRS goes after companies for similar shit all the time, Trump is just big news because it is Trump. You do not seem to understand the issues involved from your responses. Do those developers declare the project worthless, write off the entire cost of building the project, and then transfer it to another entity and write off the same losses again? Here is a Forbes article about it. www.forbes.com/sites/brianbushard/2024/05/11/trump-could-owe-100-million-over-improper-tax-breaks-report-says-latest-financial-threat-even-as-his-net-worth-soars/?sh=45b76c0d3591
|
|
|
Post by richm on May 19, 2024 14:45:41 GMT -5
That doesn't matter. Both companies are different entities. Some of the developers i work with start a new LLC for every project. That way when the project is over the LLCs are closed and all liability ends there. That's what the different companies are for. The ultimate owner does not matter. If it was not trump, it would be a non-issue. The IRS goes after companies for similar shit all the time, Trump is just big news because it is Trump. You do not seem to understand the issues involved from your responses. Do those developers declare the project worthless, write off the entire cost of building the project, and then transfer it to another entity and write off the same losses again? Here is a Forbes article about it. www.forbes.com/sites/brianbushard/2024/05/11/trump-could-owe-100-million-over-improper-tax-breaks-report-says-latest-financial-threat-even-as-his-net-worth-soars/?sh=45b76c0d3591Thanks!
|
|
|
Post by tonyroma on May 19, 2024 15:25:35 GMT -5
Do you think Trump fucked a porn star and paid her 130grand to keep he mouth shut? Sure he did. Happens every day. Matter of fact the mayor of my city got caught giving head to a coworker of her husband at her husband's work. She still won the election! The question is did he write the check to influence an election he already won. The check was written after the election. Seems unlikely it was for election interference. Hillary paid for election interference with the Steele dossier and was fined by the FEC. Slap on the wrist! Oh yeah labeled it legal expense. Go figure. Fucks a porn star while his wife is at home with a newborn, and yet the evangelicals still think he’s the next coming.
|
|
|
Post by illinoisfisherman on May 19, 2024 15:33:28 GMT -5
I don’t know about Trump any more than he is not the greatest person I would like to be president.
However he is better than Lyin Biden.
Biden screws the whole country and his cult members still think he is the second coming.
“Come on man”
|
|
|
Post by osprey11 on May 19, 2024 15:39:43 GMT -5
Sure he did. Happens every day. Matter of fact the mayor of my city got caught giving head to a coworker of her husband at her husband's work. She still won the election! The question is did he write the check to influence an election he already won. The check was written after the election. Seems unlikely it was for election interference. Hillary paid for election interference with the Steele dossier and was fined by the FEC. Slap on the wrist! Oh yeah labeled it legal expense. Go figure. Fucks a porn star while his wife is at home with a newborn, and yet the evangelicals still think he’s the next coming. First Babtist is the biggest private owner of downtown property here. Go figure.
|
|
|
Post by osprey11 on May 19, 2024 15:46:12 GMT -5
Right there you won the case for Trump. If the payment is for personal reasons NOT to interfere with an election than he is innocent. You keep conflating two different cases. If he bought the story like you said, then he innocent as it is a legitimate expense. Only way it is a crime is if he did it to interfere with 2016 election. What did Hillary list her checks to Perkins Coie listed as? HE LISTED IT AS A BUSINESS EXPENSE FOR LEGAL SERVICES. I SAID IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN PERSONAL, TRUMP WAS THE DUMBASS WHO DECIDED TO PAY IT OUT OF COMPANY FUNDS TO INFLUENCE THE ELECTION. What proof do you have of that, presented in this case? Could he not have bought the story to squash it? Keep from his family? Could he have bought it to write a future book? You have to assume, as the only evidence presented is a convicted felon who lied before this court. You think you know, you want to know, but even with a rigged judge and a 90 percent hatred of Trump in the juror pool. NY has not proved jack shit! Admit this is the jurisdiction of the FEC? Did the IRS go after Hillary for actually spending money to influence an election or not? She labeled it the same!
|
|
|
Post by osprey11 on May 19, 2024 15:49:49 GMT -5
Why, except being too obtuse to admit your wrong do you keep bringing up the IRS. What has been proven during this trial pertaining to an IRS crime. What is the building mentioned in testimony during this trial? Surely the IRS can go after him if they like. Unfortunately for you he may be running it before then!
|
|
|
Post by osprey11 on May 19, 2024 15:50:32 GMT -5
I don’t know about Trump any more than he is not the greatest person I would like to be president. However he is better than Lyin Biden. Biden screws the whole country and his cult members still think he is the second coming. “Come on man” Screwed up the WORLD!
|
|
|
Post by osprey11 on May 19, 2024 15:58:59 GMT -5
CADMAN
Last chance. Was Hillary's payment to Perkins Coie labeled legal expenses for the made up Steele dossier campaign interference?
|
|
|
Post by osprey11 on May 19, 2024 16:03:57 GMT -5
And name the exact issue I am wrong on? Since I dont understand I understand you can try to confuse and conflate 2 cases.
|
|
|
Post by cadman on May 19, 2024 16:25:51 GMT -5
CADMAN Last chance. Was Hillary's payment to Perkins Coie labeled legal expenses for the made up Steele dossier campaign interference? What the fuck does that have to do with Trump? She was charged and fined. Maybe if Trump was not President when the Feds investigated the hush money case and Trump's boy was Attorney General they would have charged Trump. Sounds like the someone was protecting Trump back then and just went after Cohen. Might be why Cohen wants to bury the bastard now. He got charged back then and Trump did not.
|
|
|
Post by cadman on May 19, 2024 16:34:28 GMT -5
Why, except being too obtuse to admit your wrong do you keep bringing up the IRS. What has been proven during this trial pertaining to an IRS crime. What is the building mentioned in testimony during this trial? Surely the IRS can go after him if they like. Unfortunately for you he may be running it before then! I AM DISCUSSING ANOTHER ISSUE WITH ANOTHER MEMBER WITH THAT POST!
|
|
|
Post by OhMy on May 19, 2024 16:43:56 GMT -5
It seems with all the capital letters you are angry.
|
|
|
Post by cadman on May 19, 2024 16:52:38 GMT -5
It seems with all the capital letters you are angry. Nope, but he can't seem to read regular type. I thought all caps might help. Maybe I need bigger fonts for him. I told twice I was responding to another member's question. I think he is just being obtuse on purpose just to argue.
|
|