|
|
Post by olmucky on Jun 6, 2024 19:05:21 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by cadman on Jun 7, 2024 6:42:47 GMT -5
Sounds like she got a fair sentence. She barricaded the doors to the business to block the entrance. Two years is good. I would hope if she did the same to a Jewish business, she would get two years for that as well. Not sure what religion has to do with it. You force your way in and then use furniture and your bodies to keep others out, you deserve to go to jail. Been my business, I would have tossed them out physically, I mean, gently escorted then off the property.
|
|
|
|
Post by luapnor on Jun 7, 2024 6:50:01 GMT -5
Fair? She should have set fire to a police car and burned a place down, she would get money from CamelToes.
|
|
|
|
Post by bullfrog on Jun 7, 2024 7:56:39 GMT -5
That’s a ridiculously harsh sentence for a 75 year old woman on those facts, presuming she has no record. A felony conviction is fine, but that should have been probation all day long.
|
|
|
|
Post by illinoisfisherman on Jun 7, 2024 8:08:36 GMT -5
If she would have been protesting for abortion rights in front of a church she would be getting a medal from the Lyin Biden administration.
|
|
|
|
Post by bullfrog on Jun 7, 2024 8:37:54 GMT -5
To put it in perspective, what she did was a felony property crime. People generally don’t go to actual prison for years for their first adult crime when its a property crime. Even thefts involving a lot of money are usually placed on felony probation first and its up to the probationer to either make their probation or screw it up.
To put it another way, did she really do anything worse than stealing someone’s car? Stealing a car is a big deal for the vehicle’s owner. But the system frowns on incarcerating young thugs for stealing a car as their first offense. You actually can’t do it in Florida if they have no record and its their only offense. Same if they burglarize a building other than a dwelling (and don’t do a certain amount of property damage in the break in). Youth doesn’t have anything to do with it. If someone of any age barricaded themselves in Cad’s store, it could be called a burglary depending on the details. But they couldn’t go to prison if their first offense and no other crimes were committed in the episode.
I do wonder if she was offered less and refused. That happens a lot where the media makes a case out to seem like the Defendant got railroaded but what actually happened is the Defendant was looking at a mandatory sentence but refused a lesser sentence.
|
|
|
|
Post by meateater on Jun 7, 2024 8:41:29 GMT -5
Sounds like she got a fair sentence. She barricaded the doors to the business to block the entrance. Two years is good. I would hope if she did the same to a Jewish business, she would get two years for that as well. Not sure what religion has to do with it. You force your way in and then use furniture and your bodies to keep others out, you deserve to go to jail. Been my business, I would have tossed them out physically, I mean, gently escorted then off the property. only thing your physically escorting is the dumb shit coming outa your mouth. #retard |
|
|
|
Post by bullfrog on Jun 7, 2024 10:55:02 GMT -5
Similar but different: www.foxnews.com/media/doj-charges-texas-doctor-blew-whistle-gender-affirming-care-minorsDifferent insofar as whistleblowing on illegal activity is not very comparable to forcibly blocking access to an otherwise legal abortion clinic. Similar insofar as a liberal DOJ is looking to make examples of conservatives that rock the boat. Lawfare, ie the use of the criminal justice system by liberals to persecute conservatives, appears to very real and could be the greatest internal threat this nation faces. |
|
|
|
Post by illinoisfisherman on Jun 7, 2024 11:42:26 GMT -5
Lawfare and the Democrat agenda is the greatest threat to our democracy right now.
|
|
|
|
Post by cadman on Jun 7, 2024 11:42:29 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by bullfrog on Jun 7, 2024 14:03:46 GMT -5
If they caused physical harm to another, then yes that would change my perception as to whether prison would be justified for a first offense. |
|
|
|
Post by cadman on Jun 7, 2024 15:41:14 GMT -5
If they caused physical harm to another, then yes that would change my perception as to whether prison would be justified for a first offense. Maybe next time, you won't jump to conclusions and make unsubstantiated claims without knowing all the facts. That isn't very objective of you.  |
|
|
|
Post by olmucky on Jun 7, 2024 15:45:40 GMT -5
Don’t go against the lefts agenda plain and simple.
If they aren’t on the list, treat them any way you want.
But if that list is close to the DOJ’s heart, you’re fooked, period
|
|
|
|
Post by olmucky on Jun 7, 2024 15:50:45 GMT -5
Injured a nurse. Lol
|
|
|
|
Post by cadman on Jun 7, 2024 16:29:58 GMT -5
Don’t go against the lefts agenda plain and simple. If they aren’t on the list, treat them any way you want. But if that list is close to the DOJ’s heart, you’re fooked, period How about Menendez and Cuellar? Doesn't look like they are getting sweetheart deals. |
|
