|
Post by illinoisfisherman on Sept 4, 2023 9:03:17 GMT -5
And rightfully so
|
|
|
Post by walkerdog on Sept 4, 2023 9:19:38 GMT -5
Every accusation is an admission. I’ve noticed this from some Democrats as well. If you want to know what shenanigans they are up to, all you have to do is listen to what they are accusing their opponent of.
|
|
|
Post by walkerdog on Sept 4, 2023 9:34:12 GMT -5
Hopefully we can get back to the how things were when Trump was President. The anti-Trumpers are anti-Americans . It's clear the anti-Trumpers don't have a better candidate and have nothing positive to say about their current guy or any thing good to say about his policies. Real Americans vote for what is best for this Country . Real Americas have overwhelmingly voted against Trump and what he stands for in the last three elections, and every special election since 2016. Proof is in the hyped Red Tsunami that never came. Real Americans are feeling pretty good about an incumbent who won handily last time around. Would you like me to post some of the Red Wave hype for further proof of just how deluded the America's haters are? You have a strange and inconsistent way of defining things. Overwhelming and handily don’t seem to mean the same thing to you as it does to Webster.
|
|
|
Post by walkerdog on Sept 4, 2023 9:47:41 GMT -5
I believe people with zero regard for American democracy, and that hate her so much that they were willing to attack the Capitol, stop the transfer of power, and see the VP hang that were, and are backing it and Trump. It's those fucking scumbags, and their supporter's that I'm referring to. It's not my problem if someone thinks that they fall into that category. That's on them. I don’t think many fall into that category at all. Apparently you do though.
|
|
|
Post by walkerdog on Sept 4, 2023 9:57:32 GMT -5
It seems that the top of the Democrat Party has turned bad after Obama. OR they just did a better job of hiding it before. I vote for almost every single Democrat candidate always. EXCEPT Hillary and crooked Joe. They have as much or more “evidence” about the Biden family doing wrong than they do about Trump. Why do you blindly support Biden. ? Could you provide the evidence that proves President Biden was involved? I have not seen the evidence that links him to any wrong doing. As far as Trump, his own words show he kept classified documents after being told to return them. He knew he should not have them and refused to return the documents. There are multiple witness testifying against him at the grand jury hearings regarding other cases. Can you provide the witness testimony that proves President Biden was involved in Hunter's crimes? I am not saying Biden was not aware or may have even been involved, but currently there is no evidence linking him to such activity and you can not convict him for the crimes of others. I do not support either candidate from either party, Neither is fit for the position of President. Have you seen China? Just because you yourself haven’t seen something doesn’t mean that thing doesn’t exist. It only means that you haven’t seen evidence of it. Ample evidence of it may well exist though. Even Tarp can testify to China’s existence. Whether you agree with him on the point or not has no bearing on the truth of the matter though. Same thing with the accusations about Biden.
|
|
|
Post by walkerdog on Sept 4, 2023 10:09:09 GMT -5
I never seen a Ronald Reagan boat parade. I never seen Fuck Bill Clinton flags. It’s a total cult of personality. Different times. The derangement didn’t start with Trump. You can thank the “But Bush” contingency for driving a political wedge into our country. Both sides have been driving it deeper ever since.
|
|
|
Post by cadman on Sept 4, 2023 11:10:50 GMT -5
Could you provide the evidence that proves President Biden was involved? I have not seen the evidence that links him to any wrong doing. As far as Trump, his own words show he kept classified documents after being told to return them. He knew he should not have them and refused to return the documents. There are multiple witness testifying against him at the grand jury hearings regarding other cases. Can you provide the witness testimony that proves President Biden was involved in Hunter's crimes? I am not saying Biden was not aware or may have even been involved, but currently there is no evidence linking him to such activity and you can not convict him for the crimes of others. I do not support either candidate from either party, Neither is fit for the position of President. Have you seen China? Just because you yourself haven’t seen something doesn’t mean that thing doesn’t exist. It only means that you haven’t seen evidence of it. Ample evidence of it may well exist though. Even Tarp can testify to China’s existence. Whether you agree with him on the point or not has no bearing on the truth of the matter though. Same thing with the accusations about Biden. As you point out in your feeble attempt at something, I can find plenty of physical evidence China exists through various means, testimony, photographs, maps, etc. As I said, i am not saying he was not involved, but there is no evidence currently available that demonstrates he was. Illinois said there was more evidence of Biden's wrongdoing than Trump's. i am simply asking to see this evidence that other say exists. However, when I ask for it, I get the Trump response of avoiding the question with some BS or simply no answer. If you have this evidence, let us see it.
|
|
|
Post by cadman on Sept 4, 2023 11:19:37 GMT -5
Every accusation is an admission. I’ve noticed this from some Democrats as well. If you want to know what shenanigans they are up to, all you have to do is listen to what they are accusing their opponent of. How many Republicans ended up admitting affairs when they went after Clinton for his? How many resigned from Congress? You say it started with Bush, I think it started with the Clinton impeachment and has been going back and forth since then. Each side looks for something to pin on the other side even though they know they are as guilty.
|
|
|
Post by gardawg on Sept 4, 2023 11:59:05 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by walkerdog on Sept 4, 2023 12:32:23 GMT -5
I just did not know that there were so many communists in Florida. 😂🤣🤣😂🤞😞🤣😂🤣😂 Only a couple of the radicals here actually live in Florida. Some used to though.
|
|
|
Post by walkerdog on Sept 4, 2023 12:48:55 GMT -5
Have you seen China? Just because you yourself haven’t seen something doesn’t mean that thing doesn’t exist. It only means that you haven’t seen evidence of it. Ample evidence of it may well exist though. Even Tarp can testify to China’s existence. Whether you agree with him on the point or not has no bearing on the truth of the matter though. Same thing with the accusations about Biden. As you point out in your feeble attempt at something, I can find plenty of physical evidence China exists through various means, testimony, photographs, maps, etc. As I said, i am not saying he was not involved, but there is no evidence currently available that demonstrates he was. Illinois said there was more evidence of Biden's wrongdoing than Trump's. i am simply asking to see this evidence that other say exists. However, when I ask for it, I get the Trump response of avoiding the question with some BS or simply no answer. If you have this evidence, let us see it. Feeble?🤣 It illustrates pretty well the absurdity of the thinking that something can’t be true just because evidence of it hasn’t been shared with you. Just because something is not shared with you does not mean it doesn’t exist. It’s not normal for evidence that is being investigated to determine its truthfulness to be publicly shared. At least not by those who care to follow normal procedures. If you want to be correct, then you would say that the accusations have not been verified or that charges haven’t been filed against him (although that too wouldn’t necessarily mean there was no verifiable evidence).
|
|
|
Post by walkerdog on Sept 4, 2023 12:52:55 GMT -5
I’ve noticed this from some Democrats as well. If you want to know what shenanigans they are up to, all you have to do is listen to what they are accusing their opponent of. How many Republicans ended up admitting affairs when they went after Clinton for his? How many resigned from Congress? You say it started with Bush, I think it started with the Clinton impeachment and has been going back and forth since then. Each side looks for something to pin on the other side even though they know they are as guilty. You may be right about that. I didn’t follow the Lewinsky debacle closely at the time. Regardless, it has been going on well before Trump and it has grown worse as time has gone on.
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Sept 4, 2023 14:06:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by cadman on Sept 4, 2023 14:10:43 GMT -5
As you point out in your feeble attempt at something, I can find plenty of physical evidence China exists through various means, testimony, photographs, maps, etc. As I seesaid, i am not saying he was not involved, but there is no evidence currently available that demonstrates he was. Illinois said there was more evidence of Biden's wrongdoing than Trump's. i am simply asking to see this evidence that other say exists. However, when I ask for it, I get the Trump response of avoiding the question with some BS or simply no answer. If you have this evidence, let us see it. Feeble?🤣 It illustrates pretty well the absurdity of the thinking that something can’t be true just because evidence of it hasn’t been shared with you. Just because something is not shared with you does not mean it doesn’t exist. It’s not normal for evidence that is being investigated to determine its truthfulness to be publicly shared. At least not by those who care to follow normal procedures. If you want to be correct, then you would say that the accusations have not been verified or that charges haven’t been filed against him (although that too wouldn’t necessarily mean there was no verifiable evidence). Republicans in Congress have been sharing all kinds of inappropriate shit. If they had evidence it would be released. But, Illinois's post said there was evidence. How would he know of this evidence if he had not seen it or read it. I asked for the evidence HE CLAIMED EXISTED! I never said it was not true. In fact, I said it could be true. That is why I called your reply feeble. I simply asked for the evidence Illinois said existed.
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Sept 4, 2023 14:20:48 GMT -5
Feeble?🤣 It illustrates pretty well the absurdity of the thinking that something can’t be true just because evidence of it hasn’t been shared with you. Just because something is not shared with you does not mean it doesn’t exist. It’s not normal for evidence that is being investigated to determine its truthfulness to be publicly shared. At least not by those who care to follow normal procedures. If you want to be correct, then you would say that the accusations have not been verified or that charges haven’t been filed against him (although that too wouldn’t necessarily mean there was no verifiable evidence). Republicans in Congress have been sharing all kinds of inappropriate shit. If they had evidence it would be released.
But, Illinois's post said there was evidence. How would he know of this evidence if he had not seen it or read it. I asked for the evidence HE CLAIMED EXISTED!
I never said it was not true. In fact, I said it could be true.
That is why I called your reply feeble. I simply asked for the evidence Illinois said existed.
Republican Representative Nick Langworthy tried to defend the GOP investigation into Joe Biden’s alleged corruption—only to end up admitting that they still don’t have any proof.
Republicans have insisted for months that Biden is guilty of corruption and influence peddling overseas, despite producing no actual evidence. But they continue to claim they have proof that he and his son Hunter Biden accepted millions of dollars in bribes.
But Langworthy fumbled that point big time on Thursday during an interview with Fox News. Fox correspondent Gillian Turner pointed out that Republicans have yet to produce “a smoking gun: clear-cut, undeniable proof of the president’s involvement.”
“Well, we’ve never claimed that we have direct money going to the president, but many members of his family have received money from foreign governments,” Langworthy said.
Turner interrupted to correct him: “That is precisely the claim that the chairman of your committee, James Comer, and also Jim Jordan have made many times,” she said, referring to House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan, who alongside Comer has spearheaded the charge against Biden.
“We are putting an investigation together laying out the facts on the business dealings of this family,” Langworthy said awkwardly, trying to recover.
newrepublic.com/post/174953/republican-langworthy-accidentally-admits-no-proof-biden-corruption
|
|