|
Post by tampaspicer on Oct 24, 2024 14:47:31 GMT -5
If you think the Republicans don't cheat you're a fool. If a politician is involved there's some shady shit going down. Ok I will bite. Tell us how you think the republicans cheat. And being your friend, I'm not asking for, nor demanding proof. Just your opinion. They use their dead relatives/people they know ballots to continue to vote.
|
|
|
Post by resinhead on Oct 24, 2024 14:48:39 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by deepdropper on Oct 24, 2024 14:54:02 GMT -5
If I recall in that movie, Harry and Loyd in the tuxedo clip stole money from somebody else to live a tacky lavish lifestyle only to lose it all, Looks like a Trump comparison
I expected the Rocky Mountains to be a little rockier than this."
"I was thinking the same thing. That John Denver's full of shit, man."
|
|
|
Post by whitebacon on Oct 24, 2024 14:54:31 GMT -5
Ok I will bite. Tell us how you think the republicans cheat. And being your friend, I'm not asking for, nor demanding proof. Just your opinion. They use their dead relatives/people they know ballots to continue to vote. Thanks for answering buddy.
|
|
|
Post by cyclist on Oct 24, 2024 15:08:15 GMT -5
Poor Rudy, losing his Manhattan apartment, 1980 Mercedes Benz, signed Joe DiMaggio jersey, and 20 luxury time pieces. Your team must be proud. Once you kids got the corrupt judges in place, there is no stopping you sickos from literally destroying someone's life. Long way we've come. Wasn't enough Hillary walked on 300 murder charges, now you guys destroy a man's life if he disagrees with you, as long as he has enough money, of course, to steal, with the blessing of a corrupt judge come on man, the Hilary killed 300 people makes you look like a typical magaa idiot. fer gawds sake
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Oct 24, 2024 15:39:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by resinhead on Oct 24, 2024 15:45:01 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Oct 24, 2024 15:47:02 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by whitebacon on Oct 24, 2024 18:18:41 GMT -5
Your team must be proud. Once you kids got the corrupt judges in place, there is no stopping you sickos from literally destroying someone's life. Long way we've come. Wasn't enough Hillary walked on 300 murder charges, now you guys destroy a man's life if he disagrees with you, as long as he has enough money, of course, to steal, with the blessing of a corrupt judge come on man, the Hilary killed 300 people makes you look like a typical magaa idiot. fer gawds sake Actually, it could be more than 300. Boyfriend Foster, her entire law firm, they were just the last victims. I know you have a selective memory, but the Clintons cut a deal to let the most dangerous traffickers on the planet run dope into Mena. The Clintons weren't playtime. Cross them, or Hillary, meant a fast trip to the cemetary. Her own personal high ranking state trooper bodyguard gets executed in rural Arkansas by gang members? Yeah, sure. And his home was completely ransacked the same day. Just random Arkansas shit, I'm sure.
|
|
|
Post by pinman on Oct 24, 2024 18:54:07 GMT -5
Ok let me see if I can get this straight... Audit preformed in GA + Fraud found + Audits requested in remaining states = magaa pieces of shit hate our constitution The rate of illegal voting is so low it doesn't warrant the disenfranchisement of legal voters and yes the magga shits and trump hate and trample our constitution. Gun control says "Hi"....
|
|
|
Post by garycoleco on Oct 24, 2024 20:54:35 GMT -5
The United States meddles in elections all over the world. It's been going on for decades. Somehow fools don't think it happens here.
Social media and Google does the bidding of government as well. They're interfering in every single election across the country
|
|
|
Post by walkerdog on Oct 24, 2024 21:17:37 GMT -5
They use their dead relatives/people they know ballots to continue to vote. Thanks for answering buddy. So, basically, you’re saying that they harvest ballots and allegedly throw in some dead people’s votes too? Democrats must hate it when the other team steals their plays!🤣
|
|
|
Post by PolarsStepdad on Oct 24, 2024 21:32:00 GMT -5
Another batching crazy insufferable
|
|
|
Post by johnnybandit on Oct 24, 2024 22:08:40 GMT -5
Those numbers are extremely low compared to the amount of dead people that still vote.
LMAO It never ceases to amaze me... Just how gullible people are... And just how much the internet controls the thoughts of otherwise intelligent people.
|
|
|
Post by johnnybandit on Oct 24, 2024 22:13:59 GMT -5
Slippery slope. The claims of "it never happens," have turn to "it rarely happens." Most importantly though, an audit was performed, and corrections made. The same needs to occur in the remaining 49 states for everyone's sake. Statistically... In a state of over 11 million people... 20 people.. (and all of them did not vote) is still... it never happens...
|
|
|
Post by cadman on Oct 25, 2024 6:03:36 GMT -5
The rate of illegal voting is so low it doesn't warrant the disenfranchisement of legal voters and yes the magga shits and trump hate and trample our constitution. Here's the thing, without the audit, we have no idea how rampant it is. So what is the metric for acceptable cases of fraud? 2? 20? 2000? The metric is, when it is not significant enough to affect the outcome of an election. It is impossible to eliminate fraud 100% without infringing upon the constitutional right to freely vote in an election. States do their best to ensure only qualified voters vote in every election, but there will always be the random case of fraud no matter what is done. The family member who votes for the recently deceased, family members who vote for the older person who isn't capable, unqualified people like felons or illegals who register and don't get noticed, and assorted other rare incidences of fraud that does happen. The state has to be diligent to always be on the look out for it and try to eliminate as much as possible with various laws and rules, but also balance that with the constitution and the constitutional right to vote freely in an election There is no orchestrated effort of fraud as Trump and others have claimed. One party is not the perpetrator of fraud working with various agents to get one candidate elected over another. That is the important issue. There isn't mass fraud by one side or the other in an attempt to control the election outcome. That is a myth. Some people supporting certain candidates like to use these rare incidences of fraud and claim they are evidence the other side is orchestrating it to their advantage. The fact is, if you look at all the case of voter fraud caught over the years, you would see it is equally divided between the two parties. That it is just random individual acts of people who want to vote who are not qualified to vote. It is insignificant in regards to the outcome of the election. It is a scare tactic by some to allow them to infringe the constitutional right to vote by wrapping in the guise of election security. I have equated in the past to those who wish to make gun ownership illegal. They also disguise the need for security as the basis to take away the Constitutional right to own a gun. None of you would endorse taking away your constitutional rights to own guns under the guise of more security, but you are eagerly embrace the taking the right to vote from others under the guise of election security. Our elections, while not perfect, because we do not live in a perfect world, are the most safe, secure, fair, and honest elections in the entire world. There is no sane or logical reason to question election outcomes after the final counts and certification has been done.
|
|
|
Post by JS84 on Oct 25, 2024 6:54:01 GMT -5
What rights are taken away or infringed by an audit? Bonus points for telling everyone how we know it's insignificant without an audit.
|
|
|
Post by resinhead on Oct 25, 2024 7:19:20 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ferris1248 on Oct 25, 2024 8:06:15 GMT -5
The rate of illegal voting is so low it doesn't warrant the disenfranchisement of legal voters and yes the magga shits and trump hate and trample our constitution. Here's the thing, without the audit, we have no idea how rampant it is. So what is the metric for acceptable cases of fraud? 2? 20? 2000? I don't know that any are acceptable but you have to acknowledge in an undertaking of this magnitude there will be cases of fraud and mistakes will be made. If there is not a clear case of the election being compromised then you move on. It comes down to no harm, no foul.
|
|
|
Post by cadman on Oct 25, 2024 8:15:34 GMT -5
What rights are taken away or infringed by an audit? Bonus points for telling everyone how we know it's insignificant without an audit. Never said the audit did. I am talking about the many laws that have been proposed in the name of "election security" to prevent "massive fraud" that is not occuring. As I said, the state has to do it's best to ensure only qualified voters are on the rolls. We know it is insignificant because the states routinely check the voter rolls and other cases of fraud have been discovered and prosecuted. Considering the amount caught over the years, it is insignificant and also equally divided between the parties and not orchestrated by one party or the other to try and influence the outcome of an election.
|
|