|
Post by bullfrog on Jun 13, 2024 12:51:18 GMT -5
www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-235_n7ip.pdfIn a unanimous opinion, authored by one of the Court’s anti-abortion conservatives, the Court shot down a challenge to the FDA making morning after abortion pills easily available. This is what happens when Federalists are on the bench. They follow the Constitution even when it leads to a result they don’t like. You liberals take notice. Your side doesn’t often do that.
|
|
|
Post by tonyroma on Jun 13, 2024 13:15:36 GMT -5
This case was about the abortion pills, not the morning after pill.
|
|
|
Post by Tarponator on Jun 13, 2024 13:40:25 GMT -5
To say that "Federalist"s follow the Constitution and "liberals" do not "often" is patently absurd and a clearly biased statement.
A more accurate description of what happened here is a 5th Circuit judge, another "Federalist" incidentally, went off the deep end and SCOTUS had to step in to correct them based on standing while laying out a path to do precisely what they seemingly ruled against in the future.
|
|
|
Post by gardawg on Jun 13, 2024 13:42:14 GMT -5
Politicians have been known to cover their ass when an election is near.
|
|
|
Post by meateater on Jun 13, 2024 14:12:42 GMT -5
Politicians have been known to cover their ass when an election is near. get outa here , what are you some kinda conspirasy theorist. thats our government your talking about.
|
|
|
Post by walkerdog on Jun 13, 2024 14:20:29 GMT -5
They just wanted something to complain about. This won’t fit that bill.
Damn the SCOTUS! Why do they have to be so good at following that pesky constitution thingy?!?!🙄
|
|
|
Post by tampaspicer on Jun 13, 2024 14:22:29 GMT -5
Politicians have been known to cover their ass when an election is near. get outa here , what are you some kinda conspirasy theorist. thats our government your talking about. LMAO we are the most honest country in the world
|
|
|
Post by meateater on Jun 13, 2024 14:24:50 GMT -5
get outa here , what are you some kinda conspirasy theorist. thats our government your talking about. LMAO we are the most honest country in the world you trying to trigger me
|
|
|
Post by bullfrog on Jun 13, 2024 14:28:31 GMT -5
This case was about the abortion pills, not the morning after pill. Its all practically the same. If it kills the fertilized egg, its an abortion pill. My point stands.
|
|
|
Post by bullfrog on Jun 13, 2024 14:40:22 GMT -5
To say that "Federalist"s follow the Constitution and "liberals" do not "often" is patently absurd and a clearly biased statement.
A more accurate description of what happened here is a 5th Circuit judge, another "Federalist" incidentally, went off the deep end and SCOTUS had to step in to correct them based on standing while laying out a path to do precisely what they seemingly ruled against in the future.
Liberal Justices historically (at least the last 70 years or so) tend to decide what they think the right moral outcome is and then restructure the law to bring about the desired outcome. Conservative Justices usually follow the law first, even if it leads to an outcome they find distasteful.
|
|
|
Post by tampaspicer on Jun 13, 2024 14:56:39 GMT -5
LMAO we are the most honest country in the world you trying to trigger me Come on meat you seem like a pretty thick skinned guy.
|
|
|
Post by Tarponator on Jun 13, 2024 15:07:07 GMT -5
To say that "Federalist"s follow the Constitution and "liberals" do not "often" is patently absurd and a clearly biased statement.
A more accurate description of what happened here is a 5th Circuit judge, another "Federalist" incidentally, went off the deep end and SCOTUS had to step in to correct them based on standing while laying out a path to do precisely what they seemingly ruled against in the future.
Liberal Justices historically (at least the last 70 years or so) tend to decide what they think the right moral outcome is and then restructure the law to bring about the desired outcome. Conservative Justices usually follow the law first, even if it leads to an outcome they find distasteful. There is no need to repeat yourself. I understood your point the first time you made it.
It's still bullshit, even with your use of the words "tend to" and "usually". For example, and in this very case, the original judge and the 5th circuit appeals court -- all Federalists or Federalist-led -- overstepped their bounds, and SCOTUS chose to step in -- by my count that's 2-1 and quite the opposite of "tend to" or "usually". Are you, or have you ever been, a member of the Federalist Society?
|
|
|
Post by walkerdog on Jun 13, 2024 15:12:34 GMT -5
There’s definitely some BS being spread around this thread.
Its not where you seem to think it is though.
|
|
|
Post by Tarponator on Jun 13, 2024 15:14:49 GMT -5
STFU.
And it's "it's".
|
|
|
Post by walkerdog on Jun 13, 2024 17:45:01 GMT -5
Its no big deal either way, to me. Just depends on witch one the autocorrect wants to throw in there, tough guy!🤪
|
|