|
Post by bullfrog on Jun 4, 2024 18:41:45 GMT -5
amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/06/04/politics/takeaways-day-2-hunter-biden-federal-gun-trialSo check out some of these quotes from the article: “In the days after he purchased the firearm, Hunter Biden texted that he was smoking crack, according to an FBI agent testifying Tuesday. In one text the day after he bought the gun, Hunter Biden said he was “waiting for a dealer,” the agent said.” So that should be your conviction right there. But… “Lowell emphasized that Biden’s “state of mind” when he purchased the gun was instrumental in the case. He also tried to humanize his client, saying that he abused alcohol and drugs “like literally millions of people in this country” and was plagued by various “traumas,” including the 1972 car crash in Wilmington that killed his mother and gave him a brain injury when he was a child. At one point while Lowell was speaking, one juror appeared to become emotional, reaching for tissues in her bag and dabbed her eyes and her nose several times. Lowell, well into his statement, had explained how despite claims from prosecutors, the evidence doesn’t show Biden was using drugs the day he bought the gun. Lowell was also discussing the tumultuous days when Hallie Biden found the gun and threw it in a trash can outside a supermarket.” Bless that juror’s heart. Drug addicted Hunter Biden was such a victim as he used crack and whores to console himself over the 1972 car crash of his mother.
|
|
|
Post by bullfrog on Jun 4, 2024 18:48:22 GMT -5
Why didn’t the 85% stop it from getting this far? Your point was the bureaucracy was overwhelmingly loyal to the D. Why didn’t they scuttle this before it even got to trial. If the system was so rigged how in the hell is a presidents son in a situation were he can go to jail. They can rig the outcome by picking a jury biased in favor of Hunter. Remember Hunter almost got a sweetheart plea deal that the Judge scuttled. I don’t know to what degree the special counsel who oversees the case can operate without retaliation from DOJ. The verdict will tell the tale.
|
|
|
Post by illinoisfisherman on Jun 4, 2024 18:52:24 GMT -5
The fix is in. Slap on the wrist at most. You can tell by the Dems statements to the press.
|
|
|
Post by tonyroma on Jun 4, 2024 18:52:59 GMT -5
Lowell is the best in the business. Also choose wisely where you break the law. Not saying its right but a cattle rustler in Lubbock , Texas is likely to get a non sympathetic jury pool. Same as a gay basher in San Francisco.
|
|
|
Post by cadman on Jun 4, 2024 19:10:37 GMT -5
Well Hunter Biden is in court. Why didn’t the 85% stop it from getting this far. If Hunter is guilty hang him from the highest tree. Everybody supports somebody. The justice system would grind to a halt if political contributions disqualified. Will he be found guilty by a Wilmington, Delaware jury? Joe Biden made a public statement about Hunter Biden’s innocence that could be of influence to the jury. The First Lady attends the proceedings. Wilmington, Delaware is in Joe Biden’s home county that he was a Senator for. The case is overwhelming against Hunter. Of course he bought a gun (or tried?). Of course he was a drug addict at the time. So let’s see what a Wilmington Delaware jury does with the First Lady watching them. Could you post the link where Joe Biden said Hunter was innocent? I got $50 says Hunter is found guilty. You want to take the bet. He bought the gun and possessed the gun. His girlfriend threw it in a dumpster at a store. Hunter went back for it and the police got called. Unless the defense can figure out how to convince the jury he was not addicted to drugs, I don't see anything but a guilty verdict. The prosecution has multiple witnesses regarding his drug use and other evidence like cocaine residue in the gun case. Hunter might beat the possession charge since I am unaware of a witness who saw him physically possess it before his girlfriend tossed it. The judge may be prejudiced though. He refused to allow the defense to call one witness. I heard from another recent trial that shows the judge is prejudiced. A judge never stops the defense from calling witnesses. It is unheard of.
|
|
|
Post by cadman on Jun 4, 2024 19:15:26 GMT -5
The fix is in. Slap on the wrist at most. You can tell by the Dems statements to the press. We will compare sentences between 34 felony convictions and 3 felony conviction and see who gets the worse sentence for the crime. That should be interesting.
|
|
|
Post by illinoisfisherman on Jun 4, 2024 19:37:42 GMT -5
You mean the difference between 34 misdemeanor book keeping errors pumped up into felonies by a crooked prosecutor and tried by an extremely corrupt and biased judge and the very dangerous criminal act of lying to purchase a firearm by a drug addicted person?
What is more dangerous to the public? A drug addicted person with a firearm or a person whose accountant made a disputable bookkeeping error?
“Come on man”
🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
|
|
|
Post by bullfrog on Jun 4, 2024 19:40:56 GMT -5
Will he be found guilty by a Wilmington, Delaware jury? Joe Biden made a public statement about Hunter Biden’s innocence that could be of influence to the jury. The First Lady attends the proceedings. Wilmington, Delaware is in Joe Biden’s home county that he was a Senator for. The case is overwhelming against Hunter. Of course he bought a gun (or tried?). Of course he was a drug addict at the time. So let’s see what a Wilmington Delaware jury does with the First Lady watching them. Could you post the link where Joe Biden said Hunter was innocent? I got $50 says Hunter is found guilty. You want to take the bet. You and Tarp are dead-set on trying to get me to make what may very well be an illegal bet. I’m not going to do it. You are correct though about Biden’s comment. Biden’s comment on Hunter’s guilt was a year ago, but published to my feed on the day the trial started. I thought he made it yesterday: thehill.com/homenews/house/4699260-hakeem-jeffries-defends-biden-saying-his-son-hunter-has-done-nothing-wrong/mlite/?nxs-test=mliteHunter should be found guilty. The evidence is overwhelming. So there should be no reasonable explanation except political bias if he isn’t.
|
|
|
Post by bullfrog on Jun 4, 2024 19:41:37 GMT -5
You mean the difference between 34 misdemeanor book keeping errors pumped up into felonies by a crooked prosecutor and tried by an extremely corrupt and biased judge and the very dangerous criminal act of lying to purchase a firearm by a drug addicted person? What is more dangerous to the public? A drug addicted person with a firearm or a person whose accountant made a disputable bookkeeping error? “Come on man” 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂 Spot on.
|
|
|
Post by bullfrog on Jun 4, 2024 19:43:17 GMT -5
. A judge never stops the defense from calling witnesses. It is unheard of. That’s not true at all. Irrelevant defense witnesses absolutely can and will be excluded.
|
|
|
Post by cadman on Jun 4, 2024 19:48:49 GMT -5
Could you post the link where Joe Biden said Hunter was innocent? I got $50 says Hunter is found guilty. You want to take the bet. You and Tarp are dead-set on trying to get me to make what may very well be an illegal bet. I’m not going to do it. You are correct though about Biden’s comment. Biden’s comment on Hunter’s guilt was a year ago, but published to my feed on the day the trial started. I thought he made it yesterday: thehill.com/homenews/house/4699260-hakeem-jeffries-defends-biden-saying-his-son-hunter-has-done-nothing-wrong/mlite/?nxs-test=mliteHunter should be found guilty. The evidence is overwhelming. So there should be no reasonable explanation except political bias if he isn’t. The remark had nothing to do with the gun charges. It was regarding the House investigation of his financial dealings. In his first one-on-one interview since announcing a 2024 reelection bid, President Joe Biden defended his son, Hunter, who has faced intense scrutiny by Republicans over his financial dealings, prompting wide-ranging inquiries into Biden and the Biden family by the GOP-led House. “First of all, my son has done nothing wrong,” Biden said when asked about his son in an interview with MSNBC's Stephanie Ruhle that aired Friday night. "I trust him. I have faith in him.” www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2023/05/06/biden-hunter-done-nothing-wrong/70190647007/
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Jun 4, 2024 19:50:01 GMT -5
Every jury in America seems to be rigged to some.
|
|
|
Post by cadman on Jun 4, 2024 19:57:54 GMT -5
. A judge never stops the defense from calling witnesses. It is unheard of. That’s not true at all. Irrelevant defense witnesses absolutely can and will be excluded. I know it's not true. You missed the joke.
|
|
|
Post by cadman on Jun 4, 2024 20:03:23 GMT -5
You mean the difference between 34 misdemeanor book keeping errors pumped up into felonies by a crooked prosecutor and tried by an extremely corrupt and biased judge and the very dangerous criminal act of lying to purchase a firearm by a drug addicted person? What is more dangerous to the public? A drug addicted person with a firearm or a person whose accountant made a disputable bookkeeping error? “Come on man” 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂 Spot on. So a felony is not a felony? If the law calls for the same punishment, you think felonies should be sentenced differently. 34 felonies should be treated lighter then three even if the law says they are the same penalty for each conviction.
|
|
|
Post by cadman on Jun 4, 2024 20:23:49 GMT -5
Let me ask it another way, what would you recommend as a sentence in each case considering under the law the max prison sentence is 20 years for both. Trump is four years per conviction to a max of 20. Hunter is 10, 5, and 10 for a max of 20.
|
|