|
Post by osprey11 on Jun 2, 2024 13:01:30 GMT -5
Funny there was no violence after the verdict. Hope the left reacts the same way when they lose in November.
|
|
|
Post by bullfrog on Jun 2, 2024 13:28:03 GMT -5
I’ve never said any such thing and its dishonest of you to imply I have. I was referring to Trump's plans. You are right and I unfairly painted you in with my broad brush. I'm sorry. However, your talk of being disappeared is ridiculous since it's not the left that's actually proposing that very thing, and ginning their masses up with that sort of talk. I accept your apology and move on from it. What I’m saying is that I think the hard lines are being laid for the two sides to view each other as enemies that can never be friendly neighbors that agree to disagree. I agree with some Democrats who have called for Trump to be pardoned on the State and Federal levels. It would make Democrats look more magnanimous and take off the table the table any possibility or appearances that the prosecutions are designed to effect the election.
|
|
|
Post by walkerdog on Jun 2, 2024 13:48:50 GMT -5
That's rich nonsense coming from those bragging about their actual plans to build concentration camps and round up millions to disappear. I’ve never said any such thing and its dishonest of you to imply I have. BT? Dishonest? You don’t say!🤣 It’s not surprising that he tries to emulate Lyin’ Biden.🤪
|
|
|
Post by dragonbait on Jun 2, 2024 13:51:33 GMT -5
I was referring to Trump's plans. You are right and I unfairly painted you in with my broad brush. I'm sorry. However, your talk of being disappeared is ridiculous since it's not the left that's actually proposing that very thing, and ginning their masses up with that sort of talk. I accept your apology and move on from it. What I’m saying is that I think the hard lines are being laid for the two sides to view each other as enemies that can never be friendly neighbors that agree to disagree. I agree with some Democrats who have called for Trump to be pardoned on the State and Federal levels. It would make Democrats look more magnanimous and take off the table the table any possibility or appearances that the prosecutions are designed to effect the election. How many of the people that you have helped convict should be pardoned? The prosecutions began before tfg was a candidate the only reason he is running is to avoid prison
|
|
|
Post by bullfrog on Jun 2, 2024 14:00:13 GMT -5
I accept your apology and move on from it. What I’m saying is that I think the hard lines are being laid for the two sides to view each other as enemies that can never be friendly neighbors that agree to disagree. I agree with some Democrats who have called for Trump to be pardoned on the State and Federal levels. It would make Democrats look more magnanimous and take off the table the table any possibility or appearances that the prosecutions are designed to effect the election. How many of the people that you have helped convict should be pardoned? The prosecutions began before tfg was a candidate the only reason he is running is to avoid prison Two points: 1. I’ve never prosecuted anyone running for President, nor have I or would I prosecute someone for calling a payment to their attorney a “legal expense” instead of “reimbursement to attorney for hush money paid to a skank whore for an adulterous sexual encounter that was awkward for all involved.” 2. I don’t rule out that Trump decided to run this time because of the prosecutions. And yet I don’t think the prosecutions would have likely happened had he quietly faded away. So its a chicken or egg argument.
|
|
|
Post by nikonoclast on Jun 2, 2024 14:20:33 GMT -5
The prosecutions began before tfg was a candidate the only reason he is running is to avoid prison That's certainly a motivating factor. But greater wealth, more power, and further inflation of his ego, come first. "The base" are indeed clueless. They identify with the power of the bully "boss man". The plain facts are staring them in the face, and they refuse to open their eyes. Trump is a very troubled individual, deeply disturbed, and unfit for high office. But, in the final analysis, Mitch McConnell is the person to blame. Trump was/is a dimwit who didn't know any better. McConnell knew exactly what he was doing. He deserves a very slow and painful death. I'll be sure to get up early for the funeral. Then stand in line to piss on his grave.
|
|
|
Post by walkerdog on Jun 2, 2024 14:34:54 GMT -5
Thanks for sharing your perspective.
Not sure it fits reality. But it’s interesting to see none the less.
|
|
|
Post by pinman on Jun 2, 2024 14:44:55 GMT -5
The prosecutions began before tfg was a candidate the only reason he is running is to avoid prison That's certainly a motivating factor. But greater wealth, more power, and further inflation of his ego, come first. "The base" are indeed clueless. They identify with the power of the bully "boss man". The plain facts are staring them in the face, and they refuse to open their eyes. Trump is a very troubled individual, deeply disturbed, and unfit for high office. But, in the final analysis, Mitch McConnell is the person to blame. Trump was/is a dimwit who didn't know any better. McConnell knew exactly what he was doing. He deserves a very slow and painful death. I'll be sure to get up early for the funeral. Then stand in line to piss on his grave. Geeezzz!!! Is Sunday "shroom tea" day?
|
|
|
Post by dragonbait on Jun 2, 2024 14:49:39 GMT -5
How many of the people that you have helped convict should be pardoned? The prosecutions began before tfg was a candidate the only reason he is running is to avoid prison Two points: 1. I’ve never prosecuted anyone running for President, nor have I or would I prosecute someone for calling a payment to their attorney a “legal expense” instead of “reimbursement to attorney for hush money paid to a skank whore for an adulterous sexual encounter that was awkward for all involved.” 2. I don’t rule out that Trump decided to run this time because of the prosecutions. And yet I don’t think the prosecutions would have likely happened had he quietly faded away. So its a chicken or egg argument. So if one of the defendants in your court decides to run for president you would drop the case? Your hypocrisy is showing.
|
|
|
Post by bullfrog on Jun 2, 2024 15:01:13 GMT -5
Two points: 1. I’ve never prosecuted anyone running for President, nor have I or would I prosecute someone for calling a payment to their attorney a “legal expense” instead of “reimbursement to attorney for hush money paid to a skank whore for an adulterous sexual encounter that was awkward for all involved.” 2. I don’t rule out that Trump decided to run this time because of the prosecutions. And yet I don’t think the prosecutions would have likely happened had he quietly faded away. So its a chicken or egg argument. So if one of the defendants in your court decides to run for president you would drop the case? Your hypocrisy is showing. That’s a silly hypothetical and you know that’s not what I meant. I’m noticing the Leftists on here are hyper-sensitive to the criticisms about this being a political prosecution and are really getting out there with fake and emotional responses to the criticisms. I wonder why the Leftists are being so sensitive about it. Is it because they know the criticisms are spot on and are worried about the blowback? Are the Leftists human enough to actually be embarrassed by how the system has been corrupted even when it suits their political agendas? My wife was a Never Trumper who is now going to vote for Trump as a protest against what she sees as Democratic corruption of the criminal justice system. I’m not there yet, but I understand the sentiment. I wonder how many other voters feel that way? Will Trump’s convictions gain more votes than they lose?
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Jun 2, 2024 15:07:49 GMT -5
Two points: 1. I’ve never prosecuted anyone running for President, nor have I or would I prosecute someone for calling a payment to their attorney a “legal expense” instead of “reimbursement to attorney for hush money paid to a skank whore for an adulterous sexual encounter that was awkward for all involved.” 2. I don’t rule out that Trump decided to run this time because of the prosecutions. And yet I don’t think the prosecutions would have likely happened had he quietly faded away. So its a chicken or egg argument. So if one of the defendants in your court decides to run for president you would drop the case? Your hypocrisy is showing. Newsflash: The entire system is bias at every level, and in every way, and yet, is still the best in the world. Can't cherry pick the way the cards are falling for Trump while he and his Federalist Society buddies are out there judge shopping in their culture wars centric campaign to their heart's content. If some red state nutjob thinks they can make a case against Biden, (Joe or Hunter) they should put it in the system and see what happens. Heck, that biased system locks people up, and sometimes even kills them. Go figure.
|
|
|
Post by dragonbait on Jun 2, 2024 15:14:08 GMT -5
I wonder how those on the right seem to think that the person who ran a fraudulent university, has been found to have been guilty of sexual assault in civil court, stolen from his charity that somehow this is political, the man is a criminal plain and simple and deserves to be in prison.
|
|
|
Post by conchydong on Jun 2, 2024 15:16:13 GMT -5
I wonder how those on the right seem to think that the person who ran a fraudulent university, has been found to have been guilty of sexual assault in civil court, stolen from his charity that somehow this is political, the man is a criminal plain and simple and deserves to be in prison. Because no matter how bad Trump is he is still better than Biden. EZPZ.
|
|
|
Post by illinoisfisherman on Jun 2, 2024 15:17:04 GMT -5
The “Trump Haters” are living in a fantasy world. They see things through a lens that distorts reality. Twilight zone really comes to mind.
They are celebrating now. I can’t wait for their reactions when the ruling gets reversed on appeal and even more so when Trump gets elected.
|
|
|
Post by bullfrog on Jun 2, 2024 15:23:03 GMT -5
I wonder how those on the right seem to think that the person who ran a fraudulent university, has been found to have been guilty of sexual assault in civil court, stolen from his charity that somehow this is political, the man is a criminal plain and simple and deserves to be in prison. He deserves to be convicted of real crimes and not for churching up how he labeled a payment to a porn star. Like… trying to obstruct the recovering of sensitive classified documents. That’s a real crime and he either did or didn’t do that real crime. Its not OK to use the system and biased officials/jurors to convict him of a non-crime because he ought not be president for a myriad of reasons and/or he’s otherwise a distasteful human being.
|
|