|
Post by dragonbait on May 24, 2024 7:57:15 GMT -5
Hung jury nothing burger coming next week! BT, tricycle and goat boy crying session planned for next Friday! Want to bet?
|
|
|
Post by osprey11 on May 24, 2024 13:30:20 GMT -5
Actually the conservative (incompetent) supreme court lackies have already set back justice 200 years. Just when you think BT has the dumbest post ever, a new contender arises.
|
|
|
Post by cadman on May 25, 2024 8:02:24 GMT -5
Once again Cad I will bet you $1,000 that if convicted, it will be overturned on appeal. Do you think the appeals court will find Trump innocent?
|
|
|
Post by osprey11 on May 25, 2024 9:03:33 GMT -5
Once again Cad I will bet you $1,000 that if convicted, it will be overturned on appeal. Do you think the appeals court will find Trump innocent? Of course not. I would think you know that is not their job. They will find error in the corrupt judges actions. Stormy, badgering defense witnesses, not allowing defense witnesses, and probably his reading of the law to the jury.
|
|
|
Post by osprey11 on May 25, 2024 9:04:42 GMT -5
Once again Cad I will bet you $1,000 that if convicted, it will be overturned on appeal. Do you think the appeals court will find Trump innocent? Cad trying to enter the dumbass contest. Nice try but gonna have to do better than that.
|
|
|
Post by osprey11 on May 25, 2024 9:05:20 GMT -5
Do we have a bet?
|
|
|
Post by cadman on May 25, 2024 11:42:03 GMT -5
Do you think the appeals court will find Trump innocent? Of course not. I would think you know that is not their job. They will find error in the corrupt judges actions. Stormy, badgering defense witnesses, not allowing defense witnesses, and probably his reading of the law to the jury. Which defense witness did the judge not allow to testify? Stormy's testimony is the only question and so far Trump has lost every appeal. I think it is 50/50 on whether or not her testimony is an issue.
|
|
|
Post by osprey11 on May 25, 2024 12:04:57 GMT -5
One was the witness on NDA's
|
|
|
Post by osprey11 on May 25, 2024 12:05:56 GMT -5
You know you are a pain i the ASS! You never answer a direct question. Do we have a bet?
|
|
|
Post by osprey11 on May 25, 2024 12:10:01 GMT -5
Of course not. I would think you know that is not their job. They will find error in the corrupt judges actions. Stormy, badgering defense witnesses, not allowing defense witnesses, and probably his reading of the law to the jury. Which defense witness did the judge not allow to testify? Stormy's testimony is the only question and so far Trump has lost every appeal. I think it is 50/50 on whether or not her testimony is an issue. Her testimony should have been limited to whether or not there was a NDA period. He let the jury be tainted by hearing all the salacious details that are not pertinent to this case. The judge was hostile to Costello. The judge wants to misinform the jury on NDA's and their legality. Thus he prevented the defense witnesses from offering testimony on the subject. Not to mentin his gag orders on one side only. Very corrupt judge. Oh and his daughter is a democratic operative. So there is motive!
|
|
|
Post by luapnor on May 25, 2024 12:19:03 GMT -5
Which defense witness did the judge not allow to testify? Stormy's testimony is the only question and so far Trump has lost every appeal. I think it is 50/50 on whether or not her testimony is an issue. Her testimony should have been limited to whether or not there was a NDA period. He let the jury be tainted by hearing all the salacious details that are not pertinent to this case. The judge was hostile to Costello. The judge wants to misinform the jury on NDA's and their legality. Thus he prevented the defense witnesses from offering testimony on the subject. Not to mentin his gag orders on one side only. Very corrupt judge. Oh and his daughter is a democratic operative. So there is motive! The blindered will never see it.
|
|
|
Post by dragonbait on May 25, 2024 13:51:51 GMT -5
Her testimony should have been limited to whether or not there was a NDA period. He let the jury be tainted by hearing all the salacious details that are not pertinent to this case. The judge was hostile to Costello. The judge wants to misinform the jury on NDA's and their legality. Thus he prevented the defense witnesses from offering testimony on the subject. Not to mentin his gag orders on one side only. Very corrupt judge. Oh and his daughter is a democratic operative. So there is motive! The blindered will never see it. The what?
|
|
|
Post by cadman on May 25, 2024 14:09:08 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by cadman on May 25, 2024 14:11:01 GMT -5
You know you are a pain i the ASS! You never answer a direct question. Do we have a bet? I answered that question long ago.
|
|
|
Post by osprey11 on May 25, 2024 18:02:33 GMT -5
Funny I dont remember the judge restricting the prosecution only the defense. Sounds backwards in America to me!
|
|